Grant bought this book for me for Christmas from the dollar store. It was a bargain. I had forgotten what a funny writer Garrison Keillor is. He is very adept at stringing together sentences and painting a vivid picture of the characters who live in Lake Wobegon, who are all believable and familiar. This is a very funny book, especially for people who live in small towns and have witnessed the extensive planning that goes into putting on town celebrations. I even laughed until I got some little tears in my eyes, so I recommend it. Although either Keillor or his protagonist or both are kind of into pubic hair, like, every description of a sexual liaison included a reference to it, until I was like, "We get it, Garrison. You like the natural look on a woman."
Tuesday, March 6, 2012
what I thought about "liberty"
Posted by Layne at 7:30 AM 2 comments Links to this post
Labels: books
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
the dread pirate roberts is here for your soul
John says my post yesterday was like I was running around kicking random people in the crotch. So there you go.
Well, for those of you who are interested in the results of the egg noodle experiment, it was a success. I made some Pim's quick tomato sauce that I like, stirred it all together, then topped it with some Parmesan. Scrumptious, and I am not joking. I don't know if they would work with pesto, or a cream sauce, or a carbonara, but I'm guessing so. So, without further ado, I will give you the recipe and suggest you try it, whether you're cutting down on refined flours, trying to get rid of eggs, or just want to eat something delicious. This does not make a whole ton--it will serve 2-4 people, depending on how piggish they are.
Egg Noodles
(from How to Cook Everything)
8 eggs
1/4 C water
generous pinch of salt
Mix everything in a blender and cook as crepes over medium heat (I cooked them in an oiled cast iron skillet). Be sure to make the crepes very thin. Stack the crepes, and when they are cool, roll them up and slice them to the width you like. You could also send them through a pasta machine if you want exact uniformity.
Pim's Quick Tomato Sauce
(adapted from Sunset magazine)
2 cans of diced tomatoes
1/4 C olive oil
2 garlic cloves, peeled and minced
salt
2 t balsamic vinegar
red chile flakes
basil (fresh or dried)
Heat the oil, then add garlic and tomatoes. Cook until the tomatoes are nice and sweet and the juice is thick enough to leave a mark when you scrape the bottom of the pan. Add the salt, chile flakes, and basil to taste.
Posted by Layne at 8:56 AM 5 comments Links to this post
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
the lamb was sure to go
Here are some more political thoughts, because you love it so much when I do this.
I think the Republican party has been permitted to run untrammeled over Utah for far too long now, and I intend to vote the bums out wherever I am given the option. Opposition--true opposition, not this nonsense where they pretend to hate each other and then go behind closed doors and give each other tongue baths--is imperative for limiting government corruption.
Anyone who looks at either party and sees a substantive difference in the way they practice governance is, I fear, misguided. But I'm a pessimist!
I will vote for a bushy-backed sea slug before I ever vote for Orrin Hatch, and you can take that to the bank. He is a vain braggart, a usurper of liberty, and a skunk.
I hate Rick Santorum for many reasons, including this: anyone who has designs on the presidency needs to be smart enough to know his audience. I'm glad for him that he has such moral certainty; it must be very nice to be totally without flaws (except for his appearance, voice, and personality). But if he thinks it's his job to be the country's moral advisor, and that he can say the things he does to such a varied audience, then he is too stupid to be the president.
The most likable video I've ever seen of President Obama is the one where he shoots that kid's marshmallow gun. They should run it as a campaign ad, because it makes him look like a nice dad who gets excited about smart kids doing cool things. He looks so genuine! Who wouldn't want a president like that? Why is he not like that in real life? Why does he keep secretly monitoring the American citizenry, among other bad decisions? Is it because he is, as I suspect, nominally the president but actually powerless, because he's not really the guy calling the shots? That really it's the Pentaverate running the joint? You can insert "Illuminati" or "Star Chamber" for "Pentaverate" if you wish.
The Romney campaign needs to run more pictures of Mittens with tousled hair. I think he could be a decent president, but who can say? I think the major problem with him having friends who own Nascar teams is that he clearly associates with people who like stupid stuff. But who among us does not have a friend who likes stupid things; like thinking they need a custom paint color, or wearing their hair all bleached and poky even though they're forty-five, or dressing their animals, or crocheting decorative tree cozies, or reading science-fiction romance novels? I don't know that I'd vote for Mitt, but I'd vote for him over either of those other two idiots--but I guess it's just down to one idiot now, isn't it? Isn't Newt out of it for real, finally?
If there was ever a person about whom the Cass Elliot ham sandwich myth should be true, Newt Gingrich is that person. I would take pleasure in it.
I think that's all for now. Except this: yesterday I was at Bombay Bites for lunch (try it, you'll like it, take a tip from me), and there was a group of six people there on their lunch break, and one of them had taken it upon herself to be their Indian Food Spirit Guide for the day. Boy, did she need to shut up. They would ask the server questions, and while he was answering she'd start talking over him to answer the question herself. Also she kept asking the server those kind of questions that are meant to display your superior knowledge of the cuisine, like, "Oh, I haven't seen the Aloo done this way, have you blah blah blah? And what about Blah? I love it when it has this and that and blah." Just egregious showboating, and I wanted her to cram it with walnuts.
Posted by Layne at 10:55 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: food, government, politics, scolding, society
Monday, February 27, 2012
whole new terrible meaning for "flyover"
There's a bit of a kerfuffle going on in a tiny corner of the internet regarding single motherhood. There were a couple of articles on Slate last week opining that single motherhood is not the society-ending plague it has been made out to be, and the author of the second article voiced her desire to be a single mother, because her experience as a child of a single mother was so pleasant. That's fine. Being an affluent, educated single mother with a strong support system probably isn't that bad--at least, not as bad as it is for a low-income single mother with a GED. She also thought it would be nice to do the parenting her way, and not to have to work it out with another person. Eh, that seems like a childish reason to raise a child alone. I think it's good for kids to see their parents peacefully work out a conflict, or a conflict that starts out calm, goes supernova, then ultimately resolves peacefully. As John says, parenting is not for your kids, it's for you. It's what finishes turning you into a decent human being. So if you never have to listen to an equally-invested peer who disagrees with you, you're going to have a pretty myopic view of how good a job you're doing.
But that's in good marriages, where people aren't selfish and immature. Marriages in which one of the partners refuses to do their job are better off dissolving. I've seen too many necessary divorces to think otherwise. Also sometimes you don't get a choice about whether or not to be a single parent. And remarriage is not something to be entered into blithely unconcerned.
As in all things, sometimes single motherhood is bad, and sometimes it's good. I guess people better make their own well-reasoned decisions.
Against my wishes, I have made a dietary change and am limiting my intake of refined flour and sugar. Sigh. I hate even saying that, because it's so Portlandia (thank you, that show, for providing me with a descriptor that is Germanic in its precision). I don't want to talk about it right now, because I'm still fine-tuning what exactly I'm doing. But noodles are one of my favorite food groups, and I'm not eating pasta, if that tells you anything. So I made some egg noodles and they look like this:They are composed entirely of eggs and water and salt. I am interested to see what they taste like with sauce.
Here is a picture of Rex and Groceries. They used to be so little, and now they are big fat tubs of guts. I love them dearly. Almost all they do is sleep and eat and get mauled by my children. Tough job.
Posted by Layne at 4:13 PM 2 comments Links to this post
Thursday, February 23, 2012
what I thought about "narrative of the life of frederick douglass"
What a remarkable man. This book is wonderful and awful, and should be required reading for every human being.
Where did we go wrong, as a species? When did people become things? At what point in history did one human being look at another human being and say, "That belongs to me. That is my property."? And why didn't everybody else tell that guy he was off the island? Why wasn't he exiled into the desert to be devoured by lions? Was there only one guy saying that people were property, and everybody thought if they ignored it it would go away? Or were there already so many people who liked the idea of cheating the law of the harvest and getting something for nothing that they all jumped on the wagon together to oppress the women, children, and people whose skin was a different color? Were we already so corrupt that it sounded like a good idea?
This disgusts me. There is an interesting example in the book of how Frederick Douglass came to a family in Baltimore who had not previously owned slaves, and the effect that slavery has on both the slave and the slaveholder; how dehumanizing it is to both parties. And to think that there is still a vibrant slave trade is so monstrously offensive I don't know how the earth doesn't split in anguish and swallow whole the people who supply and patronize such an abomination. I don't know if it is possible to atone for such willful disregard for human life.
Douglass makes an interesting observation that the more religious the slaveholder was, that is, the more active he was in the outward display of his moral superiority, the more brutal and base and cruel he was to his slaves. This was borne out in Douglass's own experiences, as well as those of his fellow-slaves. Isn't this still so often the case? The world is full of people for whom religion is merely another tool with which to oppress others.
Douglass also demonstrates how vital education is to showing a man the injustice and immorality of his enslavement--that to keep a slave docile you have to keep him ignorant. How heartbreaking, and how true.
Well, I have all kinds of thoughts about this book that I'd love to discuss with somebody. I highly recommend it.
Posted by Layne at 6:49 AM 4 comments Links to this post
Labels: books
Monday, February 20, 2012
today in boots and concerns both biological and political
Like a total maroon I went to Smithfield Implement yesterday, thinking that their boot selection would be better than R & R Hardware's, but boy was I wrong, and if you're going to start making smart remarks about how I have plenty of boots then you know what, Napoleon? You can leave! I know I have plenty of boots. Some people like to buy outfits for their pets, I like to buy boots, all kinds.
A lady said a funny thing on Diane Rehm yesterday. She was talking about politics and the ugliness of the presidential campaign, and symbolized it this way: if you want people to buy your mayonnaise you don't keep talking about how greasy the other brand of mayonnaise is, because pretty soon people say, "Hmm. I don't think I want any mayonnaise."
I bought a few red bananas at Harmon's today, trying to show the banana companies that American consumers will be accepting of whatever comes after the Cavendish, and they can take a chance on us. They're a delicious banana, but then I looked them up and found out that the red banana is in the Cavendish group! Susceptible to the same diseases! I want to go on a banana-tasting expedition before they're all extinct from Panama disease or Sigatoka virus or Bunchy Top or whatever new, horrible thing is coming our way.
The guinea fowl are becoming tyrannical. This morning on my way home from grocery shopping I had to stop and wait for the whole big herd of them to take their sweet time crossing the road. There are probably at least thirty of them, and they just walk around like they own the place. If they don't watch out I'm going to birdnap a pair of them and make them have baby guinea fowl for me. Just as soon as I figure out which ones are boys and which ones are girls.
Did you know that mushroom stems will sprout new mushrooms if they're not trimmed?
Posted by Layne at 9:46 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Thursday, February 16, 2012
what I thought about "banana: the fate of the fruit that changed the world"
This book didn't hold my attention as well as I hoped it would. But I did learn some cool things from it, like what "banana republic" really means, and why bananas are so difficult (hint: they are clones). Our variety of banana is called the Cavendish, but our grandparents ate something called the Gros Michel. The Cavendish is dying, which is terrible for us, but unimaginably terrible for people elsewhere in the world.
According to this fellow, the real Forbidden Fruit, the one that Eve ate, was most likely a banana, not an apple. Sure, I'll buy that. Why not? Then he says something dumb, which makes me think he didn't even check his sources, because he says that mankind was not condemned to a life of struggle when Adam and Eve ate the fruit and were cast out of Eden, but later, when Cain killed Abel because God didn't like that Cain gave vegetables as a sacrifice.
Well, sir, in the KJV it says this (Genesis 3):
17 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed [is] the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat [of] it all the days of thy life;
18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;
19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou [art], and unto dust shalt thou return.
I mean, I'm no Biblical scholar or whatnot, but "in sorrow shalt thou eat of it" and "thorns and thistles shall it bring forth" and "in the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread" all sound pretty struggley to me. I bet he doesn't even read the Bible. Which is understandable, because the Bible is a trip.
Moving on. This book made me more appreciative of the banana, and is [SPOILER] the only argument I've heard in favor of genetically modified food that didn't make me want to throw things.
Hope you can get used to the Lacatan banana. See how I know the names of different kinds of bananas? It's because I read this book. You can borrow it from me if you want, but don't buy it.
Posted by Layne at 1:24 PM 1 comments Links to this post